 |
 |
|
Untitled Document
Baffling
and bewildering, but ultimately satisfying
by Michael Sinclair |
Wagner: Parsifal
Bayreuth Festival
11 August 2005
|
The
2004 premiere of Christoph Schlingensief's production of Parsifal
caused an uproar on the hallowed Green Hill and the aftershocks rippled
well beyond. The ensuing war of words did little to pacify the faithful
or to explain what this production is all about. Under more clouds of
controversy Schlingensief has returned to Bayreuth this year to restage
his production and has made a number of changes. Whilst most of the
audience remain baffled and the booing continues, Schlingensief's vision
of Wagner's Weltabschiedwerk is a remarkable piece of theatre,
and one which is a fitting successor to the sickly sweet Christian versions
that have hitherto graced the stage at Bayreuth.
It certainly helps to understand what Schlingensief is attempting to
say in this production. Its biggest downfall is that you don't really
have any concept of this until the very end, or at best you have managed
to complete a few pieces of the jigsaw before this final enlightenment.
Unfortunately for many, after four hours of bafflement and bewilderment,
there is no salvation or enlightenment.
Its main theme is death. We are to believe that rather than being healed
by Parsifal's spear the salvation that Amfortas finds is in fact death.
We are asked to witness the reconstruction of Amfortas's life via a
series of flashbacks. In the space of a short period we digest a whole
lifetime - the near death experience that so many who survive talk about.
Thus we see the garbage of life in a constantly changing, often
bewildering series of tableaux. Schlingensief uses ancient and contemporary
images and symbols from nature, art and religion to conjure up these
flashbacks, with frequent use of video projections to add additional
layers of complexity to the production.
|
|
Schlingensief
takes Wagner's Christian story to a whole new plain, encompassing African
and Asian religious elements in addition to pagan Christian symbols. The
Knights of the Grail cover all religions, signifying that the message
is indeed universal. African fertility rites serve as the grail ritual
in Act 1, preceded by Hieros Gamos type sex rituals for the transformation
scene. The religious symbols are always there and become increasingly
Christian towards the end, but this is only a part of the story.
Set in an African shantytown the sense of decay and desolation is evident
from the outset. The stage pictures are complex yet relevant, and the
sense of serenity and beauty that the projections provide cannot be under
estimated. The much-maligned rabbits are symbols for Amfortas and the
Knights of the Grail, with the potent video of the decomposing rabbit
at the end of the opera reflecting the fact that Amfortas has found salvation
in death and that his body is returning to the earth.
Arguably the symbolism and imagery are laid on so thick that they are
simply too intellectual for the average operagoer. That may be so, but
with so much happening at the same time it is the subliminal experience
that provides the greatest impact. The stage pictures evoke a memory here,
or an emotion there. At this level it is remarkably lucid and often profoundly
beautiful. It is pointless to try and question every choice that Schlingensief
makes, for example why he chose to symbolise Amfortas with a rabbit.
|
|
Despite
the basic ugliness of the scenery, Schlingensief and his set designers
(Daniel Angermayr and Thomas Goerge) and video designer (Meika Dresenkamp)
have been able to create some remarkably beautiful stage pictures. The
Grail scenes at the ends of Act 1 and Act 3 are particularly evocative.
The only disappointment was that Schlingensief chose not to make more
of the scene in the magic flower garden. Surely the opportunity existed
to show that life does have beautiful elements in it as well.
While Schlingensief's production is decidedly radical, then so is Boulez's
interpretation of Wagner's sublime score. Stripped of its quasi-religious
excesses Boulez finds a transcendental translucence in the score, with
a lightness of touch that allows everything to be heard with absolute
clarity. The wonderful acoustics in the Festspielhaus at Bayreuth certainly
help, but nothing can diminish the contribution of Boulez and the orchestra.
He received a standing ovation, deservedly so.
The cast was universally strong. Alfons Eberz as Parsifal possesses a
true heldentenor voice that rings out strongly when required. He acted
somewhat rudimentarily, looking bewildered for most of the time. Maybe
no one had told him what is going on! Michelle De Young as a multi-faceted
Kundry was powerful in her Act 2 encounter with Parsifal with thrilling
top notes. John Wegner repeated his tour-de-force Klingsor from 2004,
his dark, menacing voice ideally suited to this role. Robert Holl was
a benevolent sweet-voiced Gurnemanz, while Alexander Marco-Buhrmester
gave a strongly projected account of Amfortas.
At the end of the opera Amfortas finds salvation in death. His flash
back is over. We are finally presented briefly with a blank stage showing
Parsifal walking towards a bright light having found enlightenment. It
is a potent image at the end of an evening that attacks the senses in
every imaginable way. This Parsifal will surely be a classic to
those who are prepared to close their eyes on every other production they
have seen, and open them to Schlingensief's remarkable vision. It is music
theatre at its most challenging and inspiring and deserves to be more
widely understood.
|
| ©
2005 Michael Sinclair |
|
|
 |
 |
|